2026-09-23 07:00 UTC
Aaah! Oh. Yes that makes a lot of sense indeed.
The UX (and architecture, for that matter) of the dustbuilder has been… uh… lacking… due to the lack of refactoring.
It evolved over all these years, and things that had a meaning once suddenly gained a different one, but are still named in the old ways.
Good point, thanks for pointing it out!
I’ve been doing some refactoring there, actually, and there, it’s named “disable cloud”, but I just did that for correctness.
It did not occur to me that from a user-perspective, this is not just weird but actively misleading.
Replies (0)
No replies.