Post #4875195 · Elektrine

2026-09-20 08:20 UTC

My freedom shouldn’t be implied cause some parent can’t use a parental control which is already mandatory in the eu. Your kids isn’t my responsability. It s unreal that the “free world” want my id simply to go online. Also same shit as rgpd. Only bigger website and corporation can afford putting million toward implementing thoses policiesbwhile all other won’t bother and just cut acces to be in compliance.

Replies (2)

@recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 2026-09-21 06:24

I hate how effective the whole “think of the children” rhetoric is. Every person I talked to about this is irl is either indifferent or even in support because they want children protected and they “don’t do anything they need to hide” anyway so they don’t mind presenting an ID… I agree children should not be on social media, but it’s kinda just the parent’s responsibility to not let them near it and the tools are out there. Plus let’s not pretend kids aren’t smart enough to figure out there’s alternatives…

Open ##4885664
@Puddinghelmet@lemmy.world 2026-09-21 07:45

How is your freedom reduced tho, an app produces a yes or no, how is that a reduction of freedom. Search for zero-knowledge proof and the techniques behind it Sources for ZKP: ageverification.dev/…/annex-B-zkp/ en.wikipedia.org/…/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signatu… Vulnerabilities: www.encryptionconsulting.com/…/what-is-ecdsa/ [Api2025] Rutchathon Chairattana-Apirom, Franklin Harding, Anna Lysyanskaya, and Stefano Tessaro, “Server-Aided Anonymous Credentials,” available at eprint.iacr.org/2025/513, 2025

Open ##4911613