2026-02-10 06:38 UTC
@ERROR_WTF@chaos.social
Sure, IF we could lift that much equipment to geosynchronous orbit, and IF we could construct large orbital infrastructure 22,000 km up, and IF we could get fast, effective, stable, high-speed, low-lag communications from ground to orbit, and IF we could maintain that infrastructure daily, and IF we could manage the heat dissipation problem, and ... it might make sense.
Or once we are able to permanently live off-planet.
There are too many ifs for our current level of space tech.
Not to mention: in a nuclear war, ground infrastructure will be destroyed, and any space-based infrastructure would be sitting duck for satellite killers (a ballbearing with attitude).
One day, if we can get our shite together as a planet, but not while big country A has designs on big country B for resource or ideological "needs".
@jodmentum@apobangpo.space @sundogplanets@mastodon.social
Replies (1)
-
@ERROR_WTF@chaos.social 2026-02-10 12:16
@PeterLG@theblower.au @jodmentum@apobangpo.space @sundogplanets@mastodon.social hmm I dont speak about a big facility, but on the moon a small one for the basic things? I realy talk about only needed fallback systems.