Post #957117
2026-04-01 07:56 UTC
That’s a slippery slope fallacy. It’s like arguing that there should be no moderation at all, not even fair one, because it opens the door for unfair moderation too…
One might as well argue slippery slopes in the opposite direction, the more you reject systems in which you have control, the more incentive they’ll have to promote methods where you’ll have no control.
Replies (1)
-
@Arcadeep@lemmy.world 2026-04-01 18:26
Sure it’s a slippery slope, but it’s also exactly how corporations and governments have been behaving and there’s hundreds of examples of it. You’re being intentionally dense if you don’t believe that.