2026-10-11 07:17 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@tinsuke@lemmy.world 2026-10-11 09:04
It might be a tool, but it is naïve not take all of its externalities into account. From tante’s piece: Usefulness is not an objective, fully abstract property: A thing is not useful for everyone or in general but mostly just for specific people in specific contexts. And useful never comes for free. But let’s take a step back and use a different example: Child labor. Child labor is very “useful” if you want cheap labor. It’s 100% deplorable to use it or accept it.
-
@tabular@lemmy.world 2026-10-11 09:49
Trust is 3 parts; authenticity, competance and empathy. Trust is broken if any of those are insufficient. If others believe AI creation and AI use hurts people then leaving that unaddressed makes one appear to lack empathy. “Quality of code” ultimately boils down to judging how it may effect people (reading it, changing it, using the software it compiles to). To worry about code quality is only to care about people. Only caring sometimes is inconsistent - it questions their character.