2026-10-23 12:49 UTC
Thx everyone for feedback. I am just trying to understand if this is an individual issue that should be fixed, or a mapping culture issue, or if I'm missing something?
It's just important for bike network analysis to have a consistent mapping standard - otherwise a gap in protected infrastructure cannot be recognized (or a gap is identified where there is none).
Replies (1)
-
@antoniovr@mastodon.social 2026-10-23 14:04
@mszll@datasci.social One thing that may have a bad influence on your studies are small gaps. Traditionally some small gaps were fulfill for the sake of making possible to routing apps to work. Nowadays, I read it is advice to link them but use highway=footway + footway=link (if it were a pedestrian path) or analogous for the bicycle. So that small gaps can be detected (and not neglected) and at the same time routing can work even if there were 4 m of pedestrian/road part