2026-10-03 12:46 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@FreeinTX@poa.st 2026-10-03 17:01
@Myles@poa.st @dowitcher@poa.st @gav@cawfee.club @caekislove@caekis.love @admin@detroitriotcity.com Why does "winning" include having a stronger military that the US? It's funny, or disingenuous, that you can't or refuse to wrap your head around what actually happening. Iran doesn't need to defeat the US or Israel on the battlefield to win the war. And, losses in a war isn't how you determine who is winning, especially if the war is asymmetrical and a war of attrition. Iran can keep the straight closed with only the threat of drones and missiles, and can keep the US and Israel at bay with the threat of retaliation using hypersonic. This isn't really a difficult concept. Just like the ideal of the 2nd Amendment. The American people could never take on the US military, but if the government goes too far, 20 or 30 million Americans can make it impossible for the US government to function.