Post #890440
2026-03-25 12:54 UTC
Funny how people, in light of the LiteLLM compromise, jump to the conclusion that the solution is to make your supply chain even more intransparent by vendoring in dependencies through an LLM's processing, rather than just using pinned and vetted dependencies by default over tools' defaults "yolo there has been an update and it claims to be semver compatible" attitude.
Replies (1)
-
@chrysn@chaos.social 2026-03-25 12:55
Referring to whose author has 'been so growingly averse to [dependencies], preferring to use LLMs to "yoink" functionality when it's simple enough and possible.'