2026-10-02 18:45 UTC
@bularator@norden.social @rqm@exquisite.social @stefano@littleone.littlefedi.social @littlefedi_official@littleone.littlefedi.social Sorry, guys. I totally misinterpreted the thread. I thought we were talking about littleFedi, not the script... I badly need to slow down a little, and ask for forgiveness.
Again, sorry.
Replies (1)
-
@bularator@norden.social 2026-10-02 20:05
@stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe @rqm@exquisite.social @stefano@littleone.littlefedi.social @littlefedi_official@littleone.littlefedi.social We're in that heaven of love where we argue to learn & grow all ways here Thinking about it, random | hash is probably poorer than random | base64 - provided your source of randomness isn't utter garbage, coz you're adding potential weakness of the hash function to the already-there potential weakness of the randomness source. Adding a same-source random salt doesn't change that. As said, this is *the* use case for the mktemp(3) family of functions.