2026-09-26 12:54 UTC
@WPalant@infosec.exchange That all sounds like a lot of unnecessary hard work, when all you need is:
(1) Denial.
(2) Wrapping contentious terms in scare quotes to create ambiguity and plausible deniability (see previous point).
(3) A way to shoot the messenger and stifle current dissent, and cause enough intimidation to dissuade dissent in future.
Replies (1)
-
@WPalant@infosec.exchange 2026-09-26 13:11
@BinChicken@theblower.au At least that’s what it currently looks like. I hope that it isn’t what it actually is. But we are going to see.