Elektrine lite

← Feed

@sawaba@infosec.exchange

2026-09-16 23:43 UTC

A Fortinet flaw that entered the exploited catalog on September 9 had carried its identifier since February 2025. A ha! A Fortinet flaw! We’re talking about vulnerabilities! Finally, a shred of context. The Fortinet vulnerability “entered the exploited catalog” <- maybe we’re talking about CISA KEV? Maybe CHQ has its own catalog? Maybe it’s in the Structural Conditions Registry? I’ve got to make a lot of assumptions here, but the next bit mentions an identifier from Feb 2025. The only explanation I can think of is that there’s a Fortinet vulnerabilities with a CVE coined in Feb 2025, but is just now getting actively exploited. So we’re talking about a 19 month gap between disclosure and exploitation? Nineteen months separate the reservation of the identifier from federal confirmation of exploitation, and this board's published test was twelve. Ah ha, yes! 19 months. We’re onto something. I have no idea what “this board’s published test was twelve” means. The rule ran, and the rating moved. I have no idea.

Replies (1)

  • @sawaba@infosec.exchange 2026-09-16 23:54

    I cannot go further. Just the title and first 3 paragraphs exhausted me. There’s no context for the topic, or for features of the website it is referring to. It just assumes you know what it knows. It’s like your 5 year old getting home from their first day at Kindergarden trying to tell you all 350 things that happened that day, in no particular order, after consuming a bag full of pixie sticks. It isn’t using recognizable industry terms for common things. It isn’t consistent with the terms it is using. It includes extra words and details that are completely unnecessary, they only serve to make the reading more difficult. It’s clearly talking about vulnerabilities, but there are no CVEs present. There is clearly some structure around this registry and the ratings, but it provides no guide, explanation, or links to additional information that might shed some light on what any of this means. Is this superintelligence? Is this AGI? Is this why we’re laying people off? IS THIS YOUR GOD, AI-FIRST BUSINESSES? Did someone really pay for tokens to generate this?

    Open ##4731970