Post #776724
2026-03-25 20:56 UTC
Replies (9)
-
@magicmarcy@ruhr.social 2026-03-25 21:07
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de yeah, but "If you do not contribute to any free/libre software project at all, Codeberg is unfortunately not the right place for you."
-
@esden@chaos.social 2026-03-25 22:01
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de Thanks! The more I use your service the more I like it. Not just for the reasons at hand but also for technical reasons. Thank you for being awesome! Will be moving the rest of my open source projects to your platform. 🙏
-
@cmccullough@polymaths.social 2026-03-25 23:42
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de Yet another reason to support Codeberg.
-
@andre_601@swiss.social 2026-03-26 00:00
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de Let me guess... This is a little jab towards GitHub and their update mail? (I got such a mail and went to disable everything I could related to AI. Sadly quite a few options seem to be forced to enable with no disable option...)
-
@pixl_xip@pleroma.envs.net 2026-03-26 01:57
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de thank you! Saw this after reading gh’s email earlier
-
@calum@mastodon.dazed-gerbil.com 2026-03-26 08:55
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de This is the best sort of ToS and AUP update.
-
@ayushnix@social.ayushnix.com 2026-03-26 10:27
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de I'm happy to see such a stance but it'd be nicer if there was some decision about what I proposed a few weeks ago.
-
@SuperDicq@minidisc.tokyo 2026-03-26 11:44
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de You don't have to CW positive news you know
-
@JigmeDatse@social.openpsychology.net 2026-03-27 00:27
@Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de Good. If someone wants to do so, grab some code, and use it to train their own model, while not "happy" I have little problem with that. If a company hosting code, decides they want to do that, I have a problem with that. Of course, I use Forgejo myself, with my own instance. Because I got tired of moving from one platform to another...