Post #76118
2025-12-18 03:18 UTC
I think the other takeaway here is that it was found in a section marked “unsafe”. At the very least, that’s a useful tool for the Devs to isolate potential problem areas. Comparing that to a pure C codebase where the problem could be anywhere.
Replies (2)
-
@hummingbird@lemmy.world 2025-12-19 08:25
The funny part is: the fix does not change the unsafe block at all. The issue is elsewhere in safe rust code.
-
@vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 2025-12-19 06:08
doesn't change anything if you can't avoid having to write the unsafe parts