2023-12-16 15:41 UTC
@TerrorBite@meow.social @wikipedia@wikis.world Ah but it is, but not by that argument alone. Objects' distinctions don't really exist, or rather, they are subjective. Where does an object start and end? Are the molecules, atoms, electrons, protons, neutrons, quarks and gluons the same over time? Does it matter? Objects are categories that we assign, based on our particular scale, perception, memory and knowledge. Therefore, Trigger's Broom *is* still Trigger's Broom. Here's Michael for more:
https://youtu.be/fXW-QjBsruE?si=tClM7wpuXzo80TJx
Replies (2)
-
@thegarbagebird@theblower.au 2024-10-02 20:29
@freequaybuoy@mastodon.green what people fail to realise is that i have been collecting discarded ship parts, and can now build a second and extremely fucked up ship. @TerrorBite@meow.social @wikipedia@wikis.world
-
@microblogc@paquita.masto.host 2025-03-14 07:41
@freequaybuoy@mastodon.green @TerrorBite@meow.social @wikipedia@wikis.world In Tsindoku, Bin Chul Han talks about the ancient temples of Japan, wich suffer?/benefit? from the same practice. The western view is that if no ancient part remains, the object is a replica, but I see Old Athens and modern Wikipedists have another view. Nice metareference.