Elektrine lite

← Feed

@pducklin@infosec.exchange

2026-07-03 12:58 UTC

π”Έπ•žπ• π•€ π•₯𝕙𝕖 π”Έπ•£π•žπ•’π••π•šπ•π•π• '𝕀 π”Έπ•π•žπ•’π•Ÿπ•’π•”: Ever wondered why internet RFC docs avoid the word "byte"? If you want to sound fabulously pompous, say, "Terms such as 𝘣𝘺𝘡𝘦, 𝘸𝘰𝘳π˜₯, π˜₯𝘸𝘰𝘳π˜₯, 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘳𝘡, 𝘭𝘰𝘯𝘨, and 𝘲𝘢𝘒π˜₯𝘸𝘰𝘳π˜₯ don't have an obvious semantic or historical relationship with the number of binary digits (𝘣π˜ͺ𝘡𝘴, for short) that they contain, and remain dangerously ambiguous to this day when calculating how much memory they need. So it's better to choose words and abbreviations that more clearly denote the size they take up in memory or in network packets." If you want to keep it simple, say, "String quartet? 4 people. Quintet? 5 people. Octet? You know exactly how big the band is stright from the name, right? Same idea when you talk about an 𝘰𝘀𝘡𝘦𝘡 in computer memory. 8 𝘣π˜ͺ𝘡𝘴 make an 𝘰𝘀𝘡𝘦𝘡. Done." Find heaps of human-friendly, non-AI-generated, plain-English advice from Amos and the team on the β˜€οΈSolCyber blog: https://solcyber.com/blog #AmosAlmanac

Replies (0)

No replies.