Post #671929
2024-04-15 17:48 UTC
It seems obvious that we should prioritize addressing misinformation that is more harmful. But what makes something more likely to be harmful? Can we can reason about it before the harm has occurred?
📣 In an upcoming #CSCW2024 paper, we present a taxonomy of *Misinformation as a Harm* ➡️
Replies (1)
-
@axz@hci.social 2024-04-15 17:49
From interviews w fact-checkers from orgs around the world, we learned that while prioritization is a big concern (too much to fact-check, not enough time or resources), triaging is often an ad hoc process. *Potential for harm* however is indeed a major factor in decision-making.