Post #671306
2026-03-12 08:16 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@applepine@todon.nl 2026-03-12 08:35
@smallcircles private property social media is *designed* to make you stay there as long as possible — creating familiarity and making you remember and think about it more frequently. Since #fediverse intent to be healthier, it does't break your #autonomy about your time and probably never makes you addicted. The consequence is that it's harder to stay using it more than how much we used corporate social media. Plus, the fact that popular people aren't much here. Both of the things we "lack of" are interesting only for #capitalism , not the liberating place we're making. What I think can be done about Fediverse popularity is attracting more progressive and popular people here — by actually presenting it to them.
-
@kleisli@mastodon.social 2026-03-12 22:50
@smallcircles I don't see where the problem for the fediverse should be. I think it is always a win for the open internet, when open standard protocols like ActivityPub are used to publish and exchange data.
-
@tferrer@journa.host 2026-03-14 10:59
@smallcircles Yes, if we never forget that the forces pushing for enshittification are immensely strong and endeavor to not depend too much of any tool we (as a community) don't control
-
@fresseng@universites.social 2026-03-14 11:04
@smallcircles I almost answered yes. No one can hurt us. This is the answer I feel good, but it needs to carefully take advantage of it. An example is Thread, which tried, or faked to try, to join the Fediverse. At least Meta tried to take advantage of it. So yes, decentralisation is a strength. It will not do everything though. #fedi #fediverse #enshittification #ActivityPub #SX #SocialCoding #poll #AskFedi
-
@TKzSingularity@mastodon.au 2026-03-16 10:29
@smallcircles push marketing will always be the bully in the playground. Keep the market place accessible for those who want it, like a school canteen, but separate from where the kids play in the playground