@Stefan_S_from_H@discuss.tchncs.de
Post #66015
2025-12-15 15:18 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@antbricks@lemmy.today 2025-12-15 15:35
Just another celebrity talking about stuff they don’t really know that much about. Jimmy’s witty and all, but his “physics is real and everything else is just stamp collecting”… sigh.
-
@masterspace@lemmy.ca 2025-12-15 15:44
Tl;dw: he has two points: That between cameras and now AI monitoring, it has just drastically reduce the cost of running an authoritarian regime. He claims that running the Stahsi used to cost like 20% of the government budget, but can now be done for next to nothing and if will be harder for governments to resist that temptation. That there hasn’t been much progress in the world of physics since the 70s, so what happens if you point AI and it’s compute power at the field of physics? It could seen wondrous progress and a world of plenty. Personally I think point 1 is genuinely interesting and valid, and that point 2 is kind of incredible nonsense. Yes, all other fields are just simplified forms of physics, and physics fundamentally underlies all of them. That doesn’t mean that no new knowledge has come from those fields, and that doesn’t mean that new knowledge in physics automatically improves them. Physics has in many ways, done its job. Obviously there’s still more to learn, but between quantum mechanics and general relativity, we can actually model most human scale processes in our universe, with incredible precision. The problem is that that the closer we get to understanding the true underlying math of the universe, the harder it is to compute that math for a practical system… at a certain point, it requires a computer on the scale of the universe to compute. Most of our practical improvements in the past decade have and will come from chemistry, and biology, and engineering in general, because there is far more room to improve human scale processes by finding shortcuts, and patterns, and designing systems to behave the way we want. AI’s computer scale pattern matching ability will undoubtedly help with that, but I think it’s less likely that it can make any true physics breakthroughs, nor that those breakthroughs would impact daily life that much.
-
@athairmor@lemmy.world 2025-12-15 17:05
Didn’t he go perform for the Saudis? Shut the fuck up, Jimmy.
-
@nostrauxendar@lemmy.world 2025-12-15 17:33
Jimmy “Brutal Regime Jester”/“Tax Evasion” Carr wanders into another area of his vast and deep expertise: technology. I would say he needs to stop flapping his gums but after all the roadwork he’s had done on his face I’m not sure they’re even his to flap.
-
@Ulrich@feddit.org 2025-12-15 20:32
Can you just skip the clickbait and post the answer
-
@realitista@lemmus.org 2025-12-15 23:15
Using it for authoritarianism, sure… But the end state I’m concerned with is a private company building a fleet of robots so big that it can take on a police force or army and win. And then subjugate the population with or just kill everyone off (because who needs everyone else now that there’s a robot army do do whatever you want). I definitely wouldn’t put it past Elon, Theil, Alex Karp, etc. One of those fuckers would probably do it if they could.
-
@little_tuptup@lemmy.ml 2025-12-16 03:32
didn’t read the article, but i know enough to not get my tech news from a pretentious p.o.s. like Jimmy Carr.