Post #647639

2026-03-10 08:31 UTC

RE: https://wikipediapodden.se/wikidata-notability-reform-356/ Yesterday, I had the chance to speak with @nightrose about the ongoing Wikidata notability reform. In my opinion, a great summary of the lengthy discussions onwiki. #Wikidata

Replies (2)

@sl007@digitalcourage.social 2026-03-10 08:46

@ainali @nightrose I contributed a lot to the OSM permanent id and contributed the wikidata ids. The problem is if a Place is "not notable" we can forget the OSM / wd thing … Another problem I do have is the use of 1 sitelink for the federated wikidata. This is regarding List Articles. In the past weeks, I made tons of ActivityPub Collections (Ordered, iterlinked and hierarchically) for Well Known Things. When I look at what I contributed there, most things have many sitelinks where they are desperately "needed". I searched for 3 missing national anthems. The 2 official do not have a sitelink about the anthem but the pages needed it and my fedi-preview too. One was UN Antarctica Anthem (as reminder to Politics). Unfortunately I did not find the time to write an article although it should have one cause it is very notable cause things change … 🧵 1/2

Open ##1231171
@KasTasMykolas@river.group.lt 2026-03-10 09:11

@ainali @nightrose he he, You do have the voice for podcasts :)

Open ##1231180