Post #621280
2026-03-11 05:43 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-03-11 18:02
https://codeberg.org/irelephant/kittygram/src/branch/main/CLAUDE.md
-
@fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-03-11 11:28
It's the difference between checking for questions in stack overflow and implementing solutions VS pasting every SO solution blindly until something works. I do use autocomplete and ask plenty questions, sometimes even use an agent so it makes small changes that I then review and test, but I would never commit unchecked changes, and a claude.md implies that the AI is coding AND committing without supervision. I can't stress enough how different those scenarios are.
-
@Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 2026-03-11 15:11
It's not hypocritical. Because you use AI to code, you know how easy it is to just let the AI do it's thing and not check it's work. It's almost like a sirens song. So you know the odds that a library that was coded with AI probably wasn't checked by a human. That's just called experience.