Post #584286
2026-02-17 19:36 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@nlowell@indieauthors.social 2026-02-17 21:06
@steaphan Interesting in a few ways. 1. It snagged a lot of heavy readers. This is good because you can't make a living from people reading 1 book a year. While there are a lot of them, they're not reading indie authors. 2. It almost completely misses the boat on discovery. Heavy readers are not looking to discover a book. They're looking for an author with a catalog they can siphon up. It also sort of elides over the notion that you only need to be discovered once. The key there is to keep that audience engaged while you're busy writing the next book. 3. Reviews. I wish we could get over this idea that you need reviews to sell a book. You need to sell a book to get reviews. While there is a correlation between reviews and sales, the causal link is "Sales drive reviews" and not "Reviews drive sales." This single mistaken notion makes authors spend way too much time and attention on chasing reviews. Time and attention they could be spending on doing the single most important thing they can do to improve sales. Writing the next book. JMO.