2026-05-13 17:32 UTC
I love a point that @ductape@mastodon.social made about the #PapersInSystems reading and discussions: (paraphrasing from memory) they start to weave into, and inform our thinking/perspective/perspective taking.
The combination of reading to discuss, and the ways the work strikes others, and how they relate it to our work, deepens and informs our reading of that paper (or blog post, etc) and our thinking and approach more generally.
Replies (1)
-
@RuthMalan@mastodon.social 2026-05-13 17:40
In the #AdventOfSystemSeeing work (over the past 4 advents), I purposefully did not follow a “regularized” path… Because it’s the surprises at the intermingling, that make so much of the difference. Too. The PapersInSystems sequence also has these happy accidents of adjacencies and not, because the sequence comes out of what folk suggest and volunteer to share/lead discussion on.