It is with an extremely heavy heart that, having spent nearly a decade in the training of Mathematics, I am fully and wholly convinced that the standard modern practice of it is entirely Jewish nonsense. Every time I have cracked open Munkres' Topology text, I am confronted with the reality that topological spaces are allowed to be abhorrences to a degree that Lovecraft could not have possibly comprehended. It is standard for Mathematicians to begin reading this text at Chapter 2. Chapter 1 is the preliminary material. I began at Chapter 1, knowing that my memory and skills were off. While doing this, I also took note that I was freed from the chain of any desire to become a standard, professional Mathematician - and thus, I was free to question the *axioms* of Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory together with the Axiom of Choice (ZFC). The history of this is of note. Essentially, the story of ZFC is that Zermelo came up with a proof that every set has a well-ordering. His proof was impeccable, save for one point: he makes an infinite number of arbitrary choices. Many Mathematicians remarked: "Hold on, I'm not quite sure you can do that. You can certainly make a finite number of them for a construction, but infinitely many sounds like a stretch." At this point Zermelo and his kike friend Fraenkel said "Ha, but here is a set of foundations that says that you can in fact do this," and then World War 2 happened - essentially the result was that it became effectively illegal to question jews, and thus they were able to impose this set theory upon the Mathematical community with minimal debate or argument. In a similar vein, the story of Topology is that people wanted to develop a concept of "nearness" without necessarily requiring a concept of "distance." This is entirely valid: the best example is that of Silva spaces. Silva spaces are not (necessarily) metrizable, but they *are* Hausdorff. Originally, Mathematicians wanted to consider only Hausdorff spaces to be Topologies. However, Jewish Algebraists came up with this disgusting concept: the Zariski Topology. The kike Zariski insisted that his disgusting mess should be considered a Topological space, and enough jews agreed with him that...lo and behold, all manner of perversion is considered a topological space, and we are made to learn about them in that book of horrors written by Munkres as students. I had endeavored to relearn the Mathematics I had studied as a graduate student, but having tackled Munkres first I am made to accept the ridiculousness of all that I have learned, and I suspect that my time is better spent stepping back and considering alternative set theories and alternative frameworks for Mathematics.