Post #467521
2026-03-01 10:10 UTC
I’m wondering if you could have any version of this—assuming best intentions and smartest people—which did not demand very similar countermeasures past a certain equivalent growth threshold.
I unfortunately have to imagine Codeberg is like Lemmy and flies under the radar from spammers.
…for now.
LLMs all but guarantee a future of oppressive noise to signal ratios. I imagine IRL connections, or at least numbers saved in your phone, will become pretty important there. So then I think up in-person local-community-vibe verification schemes but they all end with dirty marketers or operators inducing members of the public to astroturf or lease their accounts…
Replies (2)
-
@FG_3479@lemmy.world 2026-03-01 20:22
There is literally the following post on the home page right now: lemmy.world/post/43670862 Because it is posted from a Mastodon instance for sewing software and they have posted the same link many, many times, it could be a scam.
-
@ell1e@leminal.space 2026-03-01 21:46
I heard Codeberg already struggles with spammers, so I get that. But letting big surveillence data companies like the credit card companies solve this, seems like one of the worst ideas. I’ve seen e.g. discourse use a gradual trust system, there likely are other ways.