Post #448649
2026-02-28 05:27 UTC
@silverpill@mitra.social @mariusor@metalhead.club @trwnh@mastodon.social In principle, I like the general idea, but I think it's misleading to call this an "ActivityPub" server FEP since it doesn't conform to the ActivityPub specifications. You also recommend (require?) using the `result` property to describe server side-effects, but you don't describe *how*. I don't know how you expect to "force clients to specify them".
Replies (1)
-
@silverpill@mitra.social 2026-02-28 14:31
@steve@social.technoetic.com @mariusor@metalhead.club @trwnh@mastodon.social This FEP introduces new requirements to ActivityPub, and I will probably add more in the future. Does that make it non conformant? In any case, I think calling it an ActivityPub server is appropriate. Side-effects are activities, I will clarify that in the FEP. The value of result property can be an embedded activity, or an array of activities. Clients either specify them, or they don't get any side effects.