Post #4475341
2026-08-09 18:33 UTC
Yup they could use nano -/0, or they could just use micro.
A note: I couldn’t find -/ referenced online easily though when I checked it is indeed there. On Mac nano redirects to pico by default which doesn’t have that either. I think it’s understandable someone would just choose to use micro
Replies (1)
-
@palordrolap@fedia.io 2026-08-09 18:58
To flog this dead horse just a bit longer, micro is nearly seven times the size of nano, and Apple are clearly doing it wrong. Pointing an old name at a new thing is fine as long as there's backward compatibility, but a new name at an old thing that doesn't support the same features is a disservice to the old thing, the new thing and the user.