Elektrine lite

← Feed

@AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz

Post #4368541

2026-08-04 00:07 UTC

The software practice was once a mathematical activity, à la Hoare, Dijkstra, Bird, et al. But it has not been so, for several decades. If the present #software practice is to mature into a bona fide #engineering practice in the future, #mathematics-based #formal methods, notations, languages, and tools—Z, B, VDM, ACL2, TLA+, Coq, Lean, Agda, Idris, ...—must be adopted. There obviously is no shortage of such tools and techniques. Clearly, many practice areas within IT, including glossy brochure web sites, line-of-business CRUDing apps, and the like, need not be formalised. But certain fields, like operating systems, networking, transportation, utilities, real-time life-critical applications, plant control, voting systems, medical systems, financial systems, defence, and so on, must be mathematical, end-to-end and full-lifecycle—just like traditional engineering fields. Also, there is now an urgent need for a comprehensive framework (statutes, regulations, guidelines, standards, and policies) to normalise the use of #AI in IT, especially in those life-critical practice areas. The time for hoping that the TechBros would self regulate is long gone.

Replies (1)

  • @AmenZwa@mathstodon.xyz My mnemonic is: Computing is the human art and science. Computers are capitalist product. There's our tension, simplistic though it is. I think that's part of why it felt so radical, we were literally freeing the machines and ourselves. It's not a sufficient description, but a component.

    Open ##4405138