Post #4350996
2026-07-31 18:36 UTC
@chemoelectric@masto.ai
I want to criticise your presentation of Emission Theory, and so I did. You labelled distances with velocity measurements, so your "wave mechanics" are all wrong, and ignored the evidence and history that led to it being rejected, didn't you?
You talk a lot about having a scientific mindset. That means being able to accept when you are wrong about something - will you do that now, about Emission Theory, since it predicts that there is no transverse Doppler shift?
Replies (1)
-
@chemoelectric@masto.ai 2026-08-03 09:24
@FishFace@ioc.exchange You can want to do something uninteresting, but that doesn't mean I will become interested. Here is something interesting. I have begun a textbook series on The Iris Number System at https://archive.org/details/@chemoelectric with current editions of the first two volumes up. Among other things there is the discovery of a new prime number sieve that is something like exponentially faster than those known beforehand, but of course you will deny my number system had anything to do with this.