Post #4350828
2026-07-25 06:43 UTC
I fail to see why people are getting worked up. While yes the tos says the ambiguous “mostly” the rest of the paragraph gives you a clear indication why. Copyright. Which I the same reason many other platforms don’t level allow vibe code into their codebases.
CB does not want to host code a large number of repos that in the future could be classified as stolen code, and now as the code host will have to do the work of deleting it all when they get sued for hosting it. And you know right holders are just waiting to do that.
Replies (2)
-
@makeshift0546@lemmy.today 2026-07-25 07:09
So made up fears over settled law. Makes perfect sense.
-
@kingofras@lemmy.world 2026-07-25 07:03
It’s more than just the ‘mostly’. In legal proceedings they would really struggle to ‘demonstrate cause’, i.e. what is copyrighted, and what is not - not to mention demonstrating criminal intent. As I wrote before, these are phase 2 effects of a new emerging technology. All it will take is one company to go after them in court to reverse this.