Elektrine lite

← Feed

@scarabic@lemmy.world

Post #43423

2025-12-08 23:46 UTC

As predicted, a one-dimensional answer. Let’s say they want more money: they do have a healthy software subscriptions business. How can they get more by becoming the world’s tiniest streaming service? And won’t that cannibalize their subscriptions business as the experience gets shittier and shittier? Some actual “whys” within this would be things like (made up, but for example) the subscriptions business is dying - less than 1% of users ever buy a pass and efforts to increase that failed for (another reason here) streaming services are dumping cash into viewer acquisition because a war is on for dominance in that space and Pled is capitalizing on that Plex has high overlap with gamers and are making good money on midroll gaming ads during these streams Plex has legal concerns about facilitating piracy - this is the real reason why sync is shit and they killed watch together. They are desperately trying to pivot out of their old business before they get sued - OR all this streaming nonsense gives them a kind of fig leaf over that somehow See, issues can be complex and interesting. Just calling them greedy is neither. How is this the greedy play, even?

Replies (1)

  • @AbidanYre@lemmy.world 2025-12-09 14:26

    Nobody outside Plex’s finance department is going to have what you’re looking for if those examples are anything to go by. What is comes down to is they have $130M that investors are going to get back and ask the decisions they’re making now are aimed at doing so. That doesn’t mean any of those decisions are good or are going to work. It didn’t even mean they won’t backfire and have the opposite effect.

    Open ##45428