Post #4285472
2026-07-31 10:46 UTC
@MarkHoltom@mastodonapp.uk agree with the conclusion but for 36 seconds of global emissions you need another 876K of them, not 8M
Replies (1)
-
@khleedril@cyberplace.social 2026-07-31 12:21
@peturdainn@mastodon.social @MarkHoltom@mastodonapp.uk Given that you would probably get decreasing returns as you scale up to those sort of numbers, I wouldn't be surprised if the estimate was an order of magnitude higher than the naive calculation might suggest.