Post #4282577
2026-07-31 15:15 UTC
@jasongorman@mstdn.business @nobsagile@mastodon.social @scrumschau@mastodon.social
Hmmm…
I don't think I completely understand the meaning of the dashed lines in the diagram. Wouldn't transactive relationships be assumed (and not drawn)?
IE: The dashed line between D2 and D9 -- Doesn't "D2 -> D4 -> D9" imply a "D2 -> D9" dependency?
Now "D5 to D9 (dashed)" I think means that D9 depends on D5, D4, and D2 (and D1, of course -- everything does).
Replies (2)
-
@JeffGrigg@mastodon.social 2026-07-31 15:16
@jasongorman@mstdn.business @nobsagile@mastodon.social @scrumschau@mastodon.social Suppose we throw out D1, so that D2 and D3 are independent decisions. Still D5 depends on both, and hence D9, due to the dashed lines.
-
@jasongorman@mstdn.business 2026-07-31 15:16
@JeffGrigg@mastodon.social @nobsagile@mastodon.social @scrumschau@mastodon.social