Codeberg bans vibe coded projects
2026-07-22 09:17 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@thoralf@discuss.familie-will.at 2026-07-22 21:45
Guess I’ll pull all my stuff from Codeberg then, vibe coded or not. That’s dangerous as hell, because there is no guarantee that your stuff is deleted for the wrong reason. It’s their decision. But I dislike it.
-
@GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 2026-07-22 14:50
A repo host that can remove your repo at any moment because someone can accuse your code of being “vibe coded” is not a repo host I’d trust. It shouldn’t matter how good, bad, or A.I. written your code is. It’s a hosting platform.
-
@Mika@piefed.ca 2026-07-22 19:32
Very cringe thing to do when the whole industry jumps on LLM-automation wagon. This way you filter out people who actually do stuff professionally. Good to know though. Would avoid.
-
@JackbyDev@programming.dev 2026-07-23 00:01
You must not share projects that mostly consist of code written by “generative AI”-tools (including services such as Claude, OpenAI Codex). Such projects having an unclear copyright status (see requirements § 2 (1) 1 and § 2 (1) 3) and furthermore have little safeguards to ensure that they do not include harmful code (c.f. § 2 (1) 5). That feels like a reasonable middle ground. Allow some things with some AI written code, but don’t allow stuff that is a majority of AI code.