Post #4239112

@chemoelectric@masto.ai > Just because something is a standard term does not make it meaningful. It does not make the term resonant in one’s head. No, practice and familiarity with the concept makes that happen. Remember the point: the concept is something you need to understand in order to simulate quantum algorithms. > You must first understand and accept the proof that Hilbert space is a linear space of propositions You can use a Hilbert space to indirectly represent certain kinds of propositions, if you are careful. You don't have a proof of this though: you have an assertion in your document. Look at it again; there is no proof there. Are you ready to explain what tautological completeness is? Your reluctance to makes me wonder whether it is something which is merely "resonant" to you and yet has no definition. > > Do you believe that, if the scientific consensus were correct, your program would need much longer to run? You still have not explained why your program shows anything. No scientist has ever said that classical algorithms can't be fast in practice. I apologise for belabouring these points, but you do seem to be ignoring them.