@mjg59@nondeterministic.computer
Post #4196177
2026-07-29 10:44 UTC
Roy was held to have provided misleading evidence in both oral and written evidence. Rianne was held to have provided both oral and written evidence that was not correct. My understanding is that this is generally considered to not be a good thing.
Replies (1)
-
@mjg59@nondeterministic.computer 2026-07-29 10:47
Multiple grounds were found not to be in contempt due to the judge's original order (https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2025/3063.html) not including a date that material was required to be removed by. No decision was reached as to whether or not continuing to publish this material was a breach of the order.