@SteveBellovin@infosec.exchange
Post #4170093
2026-07-28 17:22 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@hacksilon@infosec.exchange 2026-07-28 17:58
@SteveBellovin@infosec.exchange here‘s their writeup: https://www.anthropic.com/research/discovering-cryptographic-weaknesses - probably no more details than this available.
-
@cryptomancer@fediverse.cryptomancer.de 2026-07-28 18:10
Journalists not giving technical details or linking research reports is a PITA. Not exactly the linked article, but I am currently working through this report, which benchmarks LLMs: »CryptanalysisBench: Can LLMs do Cryptanalysis?« by Lukas Fluri, Avital Shafran, Nicholas Carlini, Matthew Jagielski, Milad Nasr, Orr Dunkelman, Eyal Ronen and Florian Tramèr They come to the conclusion that LLMs can find vulnerabilities in the implementation of crypt algorithms, but not yet in the algorithms themselves. We will get a lot more CVEs in crypt libraries in the near future. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18538 CC: @SteveBellovin@infosec.exchange
-
@jschauma@mstdn.social 2026-07-28 17:58
@SteveBellovin@infosec.exchange This was posted to the pqc-forum NIST list: https://groups.google.com/a/list.nist.gov/g/pqc-forum/c/2r2u6SbHun4 https://www-cdn.anthropic.com/e8d50c167ad47beeb03d6109a4a484be95cb38ea/hawk_key_recovery.pdf
-
@bontchev@infosec.exchange 2026-07-29 16:26
@SteveBellovin@infosec.exchange Matt Green wrote a good blog post about it: https://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2026/07/29/some-notes-about-anthropics-new-results/