Post #4150443

@chemoelectric@masto.ai I thought of a precise question to ask about Grover's algorithm, also. Indeed it applies to a lot of what we have talked about regarding simulations: You need to be able describe (not just for readers, but for your own clarity of thought) what the outcome of one of your simulations or thought experiments would be like *if the scientific consensus were correct*. You need to be able to make that argument precisely, starting only from mutually accepted beliefs, and from assertions that are actually made by physicists. Clearly you're putting forward these simulations in the belief that physicists would expect them to behave differently, so start with your strongest one and tell me how it ought to behave, according to physicists.