Post #4144359
2026-07-27 18:49 UTC
@adulau@infosec.exchange shame, would have been a welcome addition. Feels like the story of our times with all the faux oss releases, open in name only is becoming too common.
Replies (1)
-
@iglocska@infosec.exchange 2026-07-27 18:53
@adulau@infosec.exchange what's even more weird is that their license basically only sets one Clause that wouldn't be covered by an accepted oss license: having to display the model name for services larger than the listed arbitrary metrics. Somehow the payoff doesn't seem worth deciding from accepted licenses...