Post #4107717
2026-07-26 08:37 UTC
Regarding #Codeberg and others decision on 100% ban on LLM.
Leaving the decision on whether code is generated by LLM to a handful of people strongly against LLM usage carries a risk of non LLM contributing loosing their code, and reputation. On wrong assumptions.
Example from my personal experience.
My daughter got a low grade evaluation of her assignment in her 2nd grade term in college.
She was accused of using ChatGpt .
She did not, she is strongly against using LLM (environmental reasons).
She complained, and got a higher grade, the teachers couldn’t prove she did wrong.
Others, in her class, used ChatGPT, heavily, but was not discovered, they got higher grades.
Codeberg decision will create same situations, a handful of people decide wrong or not.
Repository owner will not be able to object (this was an option for my daughter).
This is plain wrong, and personally I won’t keep my stuff there anymore.
Replies (1)
-
@ftranschel@norden.social 2026-07-26 11:28
@nieldk@infosec.exchange "Repository owner will not be able to object (this was an option for my daughter)." Of course you will be able to object, even on court if necessary. Educate yourself how #codeberg actually works.