Post #4102148
2026-07-26 01:51 UTC
@plzupgrademe@fedi.txw.ca Why did you intentionally not do OMEMO:1 in yours? Just curious.
Replies (1)
-
@plzupgrademe@fedi.txw.ca 2026-07-26 02:10
@fastfinge@fed.interfree.ca omemo:siacs/axotaxolotl/legacy is widely used so it needs to be supported, omemo:2 is the latest standard and not well adopted, omemo:1 was never well adopted and is replaced by omemo:2 So it’s an ipv4, ipv6, ipv5 situation.