Post #4089925

2026-07-25 11:46 UTC

@werdahias@pleroma.debian.social > While enforcement could be a challenge, this is a statement of intent by the Debian community, and we trust this community to adhere to it in good faith. Nice, I still expect you to get a lot of "how will you enforce this" gotcha style questions from people who don't read past the title

Replies (1)

@nilclass@infosec.exchange 2026-07-25 14:41

@gbargoud@masto.nyc @werdahias@pleroma.debian.social > Licensing and Attribution:If any pre-existing copyrighted materials (including pre-existing code licensed as free software) authored or owned by third parties are included in the AI tool’s output, prior to contributing such output to the project, the contributor should verify they have the right to submit it under the relevant open source license. I suspect this part (from the second proposal) would be even harder to achieve than enforcing the first proposal :D Like, maybe there will be a couple of hours saved by using an LLM, but then you need to hire a whole team for a year to figure out where the output came from, and if any of it is licensed under conflicting terms 👻

Open ##4089924