Post #4060518

2026-07-23 12:18 UTC

@jonny@neuromatch.social @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de > sharing the result of an prompt and calling it "libre software" does not make the world a better place. the end user decides if it does, not codeberg by fiat

Replies (2)

@sun@shitposter.world 2026-07-23 12:20

@jonny@neuromatch.social @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de they can do whatever they want with their server though, good for them. I just host my own gitea and produce software that people like on my own and we can all do our own thing

Open ##4077199
@phnt@fluffytail.org 2026-07-23 12:25

@sun@shitposter.world @jonny@neuromatch.social @Codeberg@social.anoxinon.de Especially in the case of "add feature X to project Y that was refused with: No use case/We don't do that." If the project doesn't want it, might as well fork it, get an LLM to do most of the work and be done with it. Not like the changes will get upstreamed anyway, so code quality doesn't matter as much for a personal fork. This case is where the "making a better world" argument falls apart, I get my feature I want and everyone else gets nothing (likely not even the patches).

Open ##4077200