@a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
Post #4055696
2026-07-17 03:32 UTC
Eeh, I don’t think he is going to stop tearing people a new one for submitting bad code, though. He lives for the flame.
Replies (1)
-
@kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-07-17 04:17
And the problem with LLM code is that it’s often bad and has a lot of volume. If their process for rejecting bad human code can scale to also reject bad LLM code, I don’t see a problem with allowing for the possibility that someone submits LLM code worth accepting.