Post #4037430
2026-07-23 13:36 UTC
> The defense contends that causing "anger, alarm, or resentment"—the standard cited in the disorderly conduct statute—is insufficient to criminalize speech under the First Amendment.
This just keeps getting worse the more I look into it lmfao, I hear speech that causes me all three of those on a daily fucking basis. So fucking what? All three are subjective as fuck and far more importantly there is no way in hell that could ever be applied equally to everyone. Fucking christmas music (especially before december) is "fighting words" and illegal under that vague a justification for killing 1A. The media's entire business model is literally causing anger/alarm/resentment on an hourly basis ffs.
Replies (1)
-
@Grumblesock@clew.lol 2026-07-23 13:46
@Sui@decayable.ink @Shadowman311@poa.st Ah but this happened to an exhalated niglet, and worse a bulb head niglet: the current favoured flavour of niglet. Therefore a big, pointless, expensive production has to be made of this to show that calling a thieving niglet a nigger is just not kosher in modern day US of A.