Post #4009821
2026-07-22 10:37 UTC
@navi@social.vlhl.dev @lunareclipse@snug.moe the thing is , the initial insistence and framing of this whole debacle as a “distro packaging bad” thing . no, you dont get to dictate how your free software is distributed , thats the whole point . sure , a packager refusing to change a link of a heavily modified fork of your app is an ASSHOLE , but trying to restrict distribution methods is …. not a solution in the slightest
Replies (1)
-
@navi@social.vlhl.dev 2026-07-22 10:38
@fiore@brain.worm.pink @lunareclipse@snug.moe i still think "refusing to change" is massively different from "having no official option to change except by patching"