Post #4008942

@baldur@toot.cafe I feel the same. Another thing that I've noticed is how PR descriptions have gotten longer as people start using LLMs, and they have become less useful in the process. I believe the logic is: a good PR description is long and detailed, to make it easier on the reviewer. In reality though, the description ends up containing a lot of unnecessary fluff, and makes it *harder* for me to review. A single sentence by a human, pointing me to the one or two things to look out for / that aren't obvious are a lot more helpful than a long text, which recaps all the changes that the PR contains.