Elektrine lite

← Feed

@wrinkle2409@lemmy.cafe

Post #4004669

2026-07-14 14:46 UTC

It is difficult to have this discussion because not many really want to actually think about it but I’ll do it anyway. I guess the main concern is about how this sort of content could coerce people to attempt their fantasies in real life. However, the subject for a lolicon is a symbol and the subject for a pedophile is an actual individual. To say that lolicons are pedophiles is equivalent to say that gamers who play violent games blowing up buildings or slashing people into a million pieces are terrorists. “Cest une pipe”. What we know is that there is no direct implication between consuming this content and engaging in criminal activity. People have different minds and respond to things in different ways, lolicon is not a predictor of pedophilia. Also, the Catharsis hypothesis, the one where people say engaging on it would keep someone from committing a related crime doesn’t seem to be true either. This one is a an oldie, but it is a nice overview about this topic if you want to get some context: www.imageandnarrative.be/index.php/…/98 I think the most important point of this paper is that the shoujo depicted in such content no longer corresponds to an actual real depiction of the prepubescent and are no more than fantasy.

Replies (1)

  • @dreamy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2026-07-14 15:15

    This is a false equivalency. Pedophile doesn’t mean someone that rapes children. A pedophile is someone that’s sexually attracted to children. Someone that rapes children is called a child rapist. You can be a pedophile that recognizes their urges being bad and thus not act upon them/get psychological help. This is why your analogy fails. What we know is that there is no direct implication between consuming this content and engaging in criminal activity. I know, I’m not for banning the content either. Let it stay as the nicotine patch that it is, until evidence comes out showing that it does increase child sexual assault.

    Open ##4004668