Post #3974524

@karlauerbach@sfba.social Yes, it would take careful legal–technical definition of “generative AI” (or, to generalize [Dr. Bender](@emilymbender@dair-community.social)'s more apt term for LLM output, synthetic media extrusion). If a transformation uses matrix or tensor values that are some combination of geometrically or formulaically computed constants and the user-provided input media, then to my first approximation, it could include such things as colour balance or dust removal filter or the like, and would not constitute synthetic media. If it uses matrix or tensor values derived from wholesale scraping and industrial-scale gradient descent (or functionally similar computations), it's a plagiaristic media synthesis model, and would be reason not to add a legal declaration of absence of synthetic media use, as suggested in my OP, in order to avoid a variety of grounds from civil suit and (for example) perjury, fraud, DRM circumvention, or computer/network intrusion charges (depending on the creativity of the legal word smithing and perhaps accompanying perfunctory DRM or IAM mechanism tied to cryptographic keys derived from said declaration).