Elektrine lite

← Feed

@Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net

Post #3965511

2026-07-20 17:34 UTC

Firstly, going to notice that you still have not produced a serious alternative and are still avoiding the question for how a state should approach described aggression. So, you think America is going to invade Russia NATO has already admitted to have started the war with Russia on purpose, and NATO has been striking Russian civilians, and has done a failed invasion in the Kursk oblast. two nuclear armed nations? So, if a state has nukes, you consider it okay for NATO to attack them? Or did you think a country the size of Ukraine was going to do it first? This is a bizarre question, considering that Ukraine isn’t the sole de facto part of NATO, and isn’t even sovereign. It is wholly subjugated by NATO since 2014, and does not make its own decisions. Ukraine is also obviously not limited to the resources it would be limited to if it wasn’t a glorified NATO military base. Why would Ukraine NATO invade exactly? For the same reason NATO has been invading everywhere else, like in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Vietnam, Palestine, Korea, etc. - colonial subjugation of the rest of the world.

Replies (1)

  • @NewDark@lemmy.today 2026-07-20 18:15

    You understand the concept of mutually assured destruction right? And what’s crazy about all those countries you’ve listed is none of them have nuclear arms.

    Open ##3966312