Post #3964918
2026-07-13 05:44 UTC
It doesn’t violate constitutional rights as long as whatever the camera can detect/see would be the same as a police officer. If it has a license plate reader and face detection or whatever it’s unconstitutional because an officer probably wouldn’t have been able to issue a ticket if it were a person there instead of a camera. If it’s something like an obviously missing seatbelt or phone use seen through the window at a reasonable angle it’s constitutional.
I don’t understand the “face an accuser in court” argument. It’s a photo. You argue about the photo with the judge. The photo is your accuser.
Replies (1)
-
@Rekonok@sh.itjust.works 2026-07-13 05:59
No The company sending the letter is the acccuser. They need to explain how they interpreted the photo